🔗 Share this article

In the initial chapters of the publication Authentic, author Burey poses a challenge: commonplace directives to “be yourself” or “show up completely genuine at work” are far from well-meaning invitations for self-expression – they often become snares. This initial publication – a blend of memoir, studies, societal analysis and interviews – attempts to expose how organizations take over individual identity, moving the weight of organizational transformation on to individual workers who are already vulnerable.

Personal Journey and Larger Setting

The motivation for the publication originates in part in the author’s professional path: various roles across retail corporations, emerging businesses and in worldwide progress, viewed through her experience as a disabled Black female. The conflicting stance that Burey experiences – a back-and-forth between standing up for oneself and looking for safety – is the driving force of Authentic.

It lands at a time of general weariness with institutional platitudes across America and other regions, as backlash to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs mount, and various institutions are cutting back the very structures that earlier assured change and reform. Burey enters that landscape to contend that retreating from authenticity rhetoric – specifically, the corporate language that minimizes personal identity as a set of appearances, peculiarities and interests, keeping workers preoccupied with managing how they are seen rather than how they are treated – is not a solution; we must instead reframe it on our personal terms.

Marginalized Workers and the Act of Persona

Via detailed stories and conversations, the author demonstrates how underrepresented staff – employees from diverse backgrounds, LGBTQ+ individuals, women, disabled individuals – quickly realize to modulate which identity will “fit in”. A weakness becomes a liability and people compensate excessively by striving to seem palatable. The practice of “presenting your true self” becomes a display surface on which various types of assumptions are placed: emotional labor, disclosure and ongoing display of thankfulness. According to Burey, workers are told to expose ourselves – but without the defenses or the confidence to withstand what arises.

As Burey explains, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but absent the protections or the reliance to survive what arises.’

Case Study: Jason’s Experience

The author shows this phenomenon through the story of an employee, a hearing-impaired staff member who chose to educate his co-workers about deaf culture and communication practices. His eagerness to talk about his life – a behavior of transparency the office often commends as “sincerity” – for a short time made routine exchanges easier. But as Burey shows, that improvement was precarious. When staff turnover wiped out the unofficial understanding the employee had developed, the environment of accessibility dissolved with it. “All of that knowledge left with them,” he states tiredly. What remained was the fatigue of being forced to restart, of being held accountable for an institution’s learning curve. From the author’s perspective, this demonstrates to be told to reveal oneself without protection: to endanger oneself in a framework that praises your honesty but fails to institutionalize it into procedure. Sincerity becomes a snare when institutions rely on individual self-disclosure rather than organizational responsibility.

Writing Style and Concept of Dissent

Burey’s writing is both clear and poetic. She marries academic thoroughness with a tone of connection: an invitation for readers to engage, to interrogate, to dissent. In Burey’s opinion, workplace opposition is not loud rebellion but principled refusal – the effort of rejecting sameness in environments that expect gratitude for mere inclusion. To dissent, according to her view, is to question the accounts organizations tell about justice and acceptance, and to refuse involvement in practices that perpetuate injustice. It may appear as naming bias in a meeting, withdrawing of uncompensated “inclusion” labor, or setting boundaries around how much of oneself is made available to the company. Opposition, Burey indicates, is an assertion of self-respect in spaces that often praise obedience. It constitutes a discipline of principle rather than defiance, a way of asserting that a person’s dignity is not dependent on organizational acceptance.

Redefining Genuineness

The author also avoids brittle binaries. Her work does not merely discard “genuineness” entirely: on the contrary, she urges its reclamation. For Burey, authenticity is not the raw display of character that business environment frequently praises, but a more thoughtful correspondence between personal beliefs and personal behaviors – an integrity that resists distortion by organizational requirements. As opposed to viewing sincerity as a requirement to overshare or adjust to cleansed standards of candor, Burey advises followers to keep the elements of it rooted in honesty, self-awareness and principled vision. According to Burey, the goal is not to discard sincerity but to move it – to move it out of the corporate display practices and into relationships and offices where confidence, fairness and accountability make {